- Home
- Oil Gas Countries
- Iraq Oil Field Development
- Home
- Oil Field Development
- Middle East Oil Field Development
- Iraq Oil Field Development
- Home
- Oil Field Development
- Iraq Oil Field Development
- Home
- Oil Gas Countries
- Iraq
- Iraq Oil Field Development
Iraq Oil Field Development
- By OilGasArticles Editor
- Published 03/22/2006
- Oil Gas Countries , Middle East Oil Field Development , Oil Field Development , Iraq
- Unrated
OilGasArticles Editor
OilGasArticles features up-to-date, searchable oil and natural gas industry articles, online oil and gas publication service, and a full-text article database covering all areas of the oil and gas industry.
View all articles by OilGasArticles EditorAnother large oilfield slated for development is Majnoon, discovered by Braspetro of Brazil in 1975, and containing reserves of 11-30 billion barrels of 28o-35o API Oil. Majnoon is located 30 miles north of Basra on the Iranian border. In the 1990s, French company Elf Aquitaine (now merged with Total) negotiated on a possible $4 billion deal with Iraq on development rights for Majnoon. In 1999, however, TotalFinaElf declined to sign a 23-year production sharing agreement (PSA) with Iraq on Majnoon. Following this, the field reportedly was brought onstream (under a "national effort" program begun in 1999) in late 2003 at 50,000 bbl/d. Future development on Majnoon ultimately could lead to production of 600,000 bbl/d or more at an estimated (according to Deutsche Bank) cost of $4 billion. In the short term, there is work underway to increase Majnoon production capacity to 100,000 bbl/d. Prior to the 2003 war, Majnoon reportedly had production capacity of 350,000 bbl/d.
In early June 2003, China's National Petroleum Company (CNPC) refuted a comment by Thamir Ghadban that CNPC's contract on the 90,000-bbl/d al-Ahdab development was now "void by mutual agreement." CNPC agreed in 1997 to spend $1.3 billion on Al-Ahdab, located in southern Iraq, but no progress was made while sanctions remained in place.
The 4.5-billion-Barrel Halfaya field is the final large development in southern Iraq. Prior to the war, several companies (BHP, CNPC, Agip/ENI) reportedly had shown interest in Halfaya, which ultimately could yield 200,000-300,000 bbl/d in output at a possible cost of $2 billion. In January 2005, a consortium of Shell, BHP Billiton, and Tigris Petroleum signed a deal with Iraq's oil ministry to increase output from the Missan area, which included Halfayah. Smaller fields with under 2 billion barrels in reserves also have received interest from foreign oil companies. These fields included Nasiriya (Eni, Repsol), Tuba (Japan’s AOC signed an MoU on the fiel din June 2005), Ratawi (Shell, Petronas, CanOxy), Gharaf (TPAO, Japex), Amara (PetroVietnam), and Noor (Syria).
In May 2003, Thamir Ghadban stated that three exploration agreements for blocks in Iraq's Western Desert were still valid. These included Indonesia's Pertamina on Block 3, Russia's Stroitransgas on Block 4, and Indian's Oil and Natural Gas Corp. for Block 8. In January 2003, Stroitransgas signed a $33.5 million contract for exploration on Block 4, and in July 2003, it indicated its interest in winning post-war business in Iraq. In September 2003, Pertamina announced that it planned to begin oil and gas exploration in Block 3, investing around $24 million over the next three years. The small Irish company, Petrel Resources, also has expressed interest in exploring and developing oil resources in western Iraq. In May 2004, Pertamina suspended its exploration activities in the Western Desert region due to security concerns.
On December 1, 2005, the Kurdistan Regional Government announced that Norway’s DNO was drilling for oil at the Tawke Well in the Kurdish region, near the Turkish border. According to Middle East Oil and Gas Monitor, the Kurds believe they were authorized to sign the deal (a Production Sharing Agreement, or PSA) without the central government’s permission “[b]ased on a disputed clause in the constitution.” This is controversial, and raises the question about ultimate control over Iraqi oil resources. In addition to DNO, the Kurds reportedly have signed separate deals with Heritage Oil (Canada), Al-Aabar Petroleum (UAE), and PetroPrime (Turkey). There are fears that Shi’ites in the South could do the same.
Aside from the issue of control over oil resources, the DNO deal with the Kurds was significant in that it was a PSA Reportedly, the Iraqi Oil Ministry would like to proceed with PSAs as rapidly as possible on undeveloped fields. PSAs have been controversial in other countries, with some analysts (e.g, a recent report, by a group of non-governmental organizations, called “Crude Designs – The Rip-off of Iraq’s Oil Wealth”) believing that they are too favorable to oil companies and that they give up too much control by the country’s government.
Source: Energy Information Administration
Spread The Word
Article Series
This article is part 6 of a 9 part series. Other articles in this series are shown below:
-
Iraq Oil Field Development
